Stephen P. v. Bisignano (D.N.J. June 12, 2025) - Waiver of right to counsel, duty to develop the record for unrepresented claimant, requirements for legal representatives, younger claimants, medical opinions, subjective complaints Accordingly

Accordingly

1)  The ALJ did not properly consider Dr

2) The ALJ’s mental RFC finding is deficient as it failed to address any limitations in interacting with supervisors

2:22-cv-04523-NMK (D

’s medically determinable mental impairment of depression is not a severe impairment is not supported by substantial evidence

Stephen P. v. Bisignano (D.N.J. June 12, 2025) - Waiver of right to counsel, duty to develop the record for unrepresented claimant, requirements for legal representatives, younger claimants, medical opinions, subjective complaints AccordinglyStephen P. v. Bisignano, Case No. 2: 24 CV 10888 (D. N. J. June 12, 2025) (Order by U. S. District Judge Jamel K. Semper) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: Right to Counsel Waiver of right to counsel Requirements for legal representatives Special rules for young claimants under age 25 Special rules for claimants under age 25 extra help ALJs duty to develop the record for unrepresented claimant Due process